SuperTeacherTools SuperTeacherTools Help
Create a New Game Back to Non-Live Version

Join Code:
X8SQD8

How to Play:

Instant Jeopardy Review is designed for live play with as many individuals or teams as you like! Each team will need to enter the Join Code above. Teams choose a question, then try to give the best answer.

Scoring is built in for each team.

You can also choose to use a timer below.

Have fun!

Play This Game Live Now


Seconds To Answer Each Question
Set to X to hide the timer

Prefer the old Flash template? Switch now: AP GOPO Review 4 Jeopardy Review Flash Version

AP GOPO Review 4

Setting the Tone 1st Amendment Campaign and Press Religion Your Rights
10 10 10 10 10
20 20 20 20 20
30 30 30 30 30
40 40 40 40 40
50 50 50 50 50
Final Question
Create a New Game Create a New Game



- Article I, section 8, Necessary and Proper Clause and National Supremacy

View Answer
Chief Justice Marshall established “judicial review'

View Answer
5th amendment (eminent domain) did not apply to states but only to the federal gov’t (BOR does NOT apply to STATES).

View Answer
under the circumstances created a “clear and present” danger... Although later decisions modified the decision, this case created the PRECEDENT that 1st amendment guarantees weren’t absolute

View Answer
The case, involving “criminal anarchy”, under New York law, was the first consideration of what came to be known as the selective “incorporation” doctrine, under which the provisions of the 1st amendment were “incorporated” by the 14th amendment

View Answer
-Freedom of Speech and Expression (1st Amendment) -Ruling- allowed to wear the black arm bands -Precedent- “Student’s right to expression would be protected except in cases where that expression materially disrupts class work or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others...

View Answer
-Freedom of Speech (1st amendment) -Ruling- Texas statute prohibiting the burning of the flag is unconstitutional -Precedent- You may burn the flag

View Answer
held that laws that punish people for advocating social change through violence violate the first amendment, the advocacy of an idea even an idea of violence is protected by the 1st amendment. What is not protected is inciting people to engage in violence

View Answer
-upheld soft and hard money limits and the ban of electioneering not subject to the cap within the 90 day window before a federal election

View Answer
- The Supreme Court loosened restrictions on corporate and union-funded television ads that air close to elections, weakening a key provision of a landmark campaign finance law.

View Answer
-established the prior restraint doctrine AND -Selective Incorporation of the 1st amendment freedom of press

View Answer
-the Court refused the halt publication of the Pentagon Papers (detailed critical account of US involvement in Vietnam).

View Answer
-Precedent- schools could censor student speech when schools had a reasonable educational justification for their censorship esp. when the speech was part of an educational activity

View Answer
-Precedent- US S.C. outlawed the use, even on a voluntary basis, of state- sponsored prayer in schools

View Answer
Struck down state funding for private religious schools

View Answer
The Court upheld a stringent application of California obscenity law by Newport Beach, CA, and attempted to define what is obscene.

View Answer
Court considered the use of public funds for the operation of school buses in NJ, including buses carrying students to parochial school. The Court permitted New Jersey to continue payments, saying that the aid to children was not gov’t support for religion.

View Answer
the Court defined obscene that which offended “the average person, applying contemporary community standards.”

View Answer
exclusionary rule applies to states

View Answer
The Court this created a “reasonable suspicion” rule for school searches, a change from the “probable cause” requirement in the wider society.

View Answer
-Precedent- guarantee of counsel (attorney) for all person facing a felony charge in federal and state trials

View Answer
-Precedent- “have a right to remain silent, that anything said can be used in Court, right to an attorney, if he can’t afford one, one will be appointed for him” etc.

View Answer
- The Court upheld the Georgia death sentence, finding that it did NOT violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the 8th Amendment. The Court stated for the first time that “punishment of death does NOT invariably violate the Constitution.”

View Answer
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
Schenck v. US (1919)
Gitlow v. New York (1925)
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
Bradenburg v. Ohio (1969)
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)
F.E.C. v. Wisconsin Right to Life and McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life (2006)
Near v. Minnesota (1931)
New York Times v. US (1971)
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
Engel v. Vitale (1962)-
Lemon v. Kurzman (1971)-
Miller v. California (1973)
Everson v. Board of Education (1947)-
Roth v. US (1957)
Mapp v. Ohio- 1961
NJ v. TLO- 1985
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Gregg v. Georgia (1976)





Remove Teams / Players