SuperTeacherTools SuperTeacherTools Help
Jeopardy Home Create a New Game Create a New Game Copy This Game Play This Game in SpeedMatch
How to Use Instant Jeopardy Review:

Instant Jeopardy Review is designed for live play with up to ten individuals or teams. Teams choose a question, then try to give the best answer. Scoring is built in for each team. You can post a link to this review game using the orange game information button below. If you are the creator of this game, you can edit the game with the red edit button. Have fun!
Click here for the answer key for this game

Play This Game Live With Teams Now!  Join Live Game as a Player


Seconds To Answer Each Question
Set to 0 to hide the timer

The Courts
Play This Game Live Now  Join Live Game as a Player

Foundations of Judicial Power US Court System: Organization and Jurisdiction Appointment to the Federal Bench and The Court In Action The Supreme Court As A National Policymaker Outside Influences On The Court
100 100 100 100 100
200 200 200 200 200
400 400 400 400 400
800 800 800 800 800
1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Final Question
Edit Game

As he put it in The Federalist, No. 78, the very purpose of constitutions is to place limitations on the powers of government, and it is only the Court that can ensure such limits in the United States.  The Legislative branch, in particular, is unlikely to restrain itself without the helping hand of the judiciary.

View Answer

As he put it in The Federalist, No. 78, the very purpose of constitutions is to place limitations on the powers of government, and it is only the Court that can ensure such limits in the United States.  The Legislative branch, in particular, is unlikely to restrain itself without the helping hand of the judiciary.


Alexander Hamilton


This case established Judicial Reveiw.

Background on what caused this case:  

Additional judicial positions were created by the Federalist Congress and filled

by the outgoing Federalist president (John Adams) in the final days of his

administration, after Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans gained control of

the presidency and the legislature; the apparent intention of these midnight

appointments was to ensure Federalist dominance of the judiciary.

View Answer

This case established Judicial Reveiw.

Background on what caused this case:  

Additional judicial positions were created by the Federalist Congress and filled

by the outgoing Federalist president (John Adams) in the final days of his

administration, after Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans gained control of

the presidency and the legislature; the apparent intention of these midnight

appointments was to ensure Federalist dominance of the judiciary.


Marbury vs Madison

 

The Court ruled that Marbury was entitled to his commission and that Madison

had broken the law in failing to deliver it, but that the Court could not compel

Madison to comply with the law; the provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789,

which granted the Court the power to issue writs of mandamus in such cases,

was itself unconstitutional because it sought to expand the original

jurisdiction (jurisdiction of the first court to hear a case) as defined in Article III.


This article and section states the judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the congress may from time to time ordain and establish.

View Answer

This article and section states the judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the congress may from time to time ordain and establish.


Article III, Section I


This Cheif Justice stated the following about judicial review:  "it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is."

View Answer

This Cheif Justice stated the following about judicial review:  "it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is."


Cheif Justice John Marshall in Marbury vs. Madison.


This individual coined the phrase "counter-majoritarian difficulty" in 1962.  He described judicial review as a "deviant institution in American democracy."

View Answer

This individual coined the phrase "counter-majoritarian difficulty" in 1962.  He described judicial review as a "deviant institution in American democracy."


Alexander Bickel


There how many of these courts?

1) US Federal District Courts

2) US Courts of Appeals

3) US Supreme Court

View Answer

There how many of these courts?

1) US Federal District Courts

2) US Courts of Appeals

3) US Supreme Court


1) US Federal District Courts - 94

2) US Courts of Appeals - 13 

3) US Supreme Court - 1

 

These are all called Constitutional Courts because they were created by Congress under Article III, which discusses the judicial branch.

 

GREE141.GIF


This map shows the 12 geographic circuit courts. Which one of the courts does the map represent?

 

View Answer

This map shows the 12 geographic circuit courts. Which one of the courts does the map represent?

 


The US Courts of Appeal.

 

The US Courts of Appeals Circuit Courts are the thirteen intermediate appellate courts immediately below the US Supreme Court. Twelve of the Circuit Courts hear cases on appeal from US District Courts (trial) within their territorial jurisdiction; the thirteenth court, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, has national subject-matter jurisdiction over cases initially held in the US Court of Claims, as well as appeals of patent, copyright, and a few other classes of cases.

  1. US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  2. US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  3. US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  4. US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  5. US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  6. US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
  7. US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
  8. US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  9. US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  10. US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  11. US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  12. US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
  13. US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

This shows what?

 

GREE143.GIF

View Answer

This shows what?

 

GREE143.GIF


How Cases Get to the Supreme Court.

 

 


What is the only way to remove a federal judge?

View Answer

What is the only way to remove a federal judge?


Impeachment by Congress


This is the doctrine of closely following precedent as the basis for

legal reasoning; past decisions serve as the basis for current similar

decisions.

View Answer

This is the doctrine of closely following precedent as the basis for

legal reasoning; past decisions serve as the basis for current similar

decisions.


Stare decisis


True or False: The constitution establishes strict qualifications or criteria for judicial branch.  All have to be lawyers for atleast 5 years.

View Answer

True or False: The constitution establishes strict qualifications or criteria for judicial branch.  All have to be lawyers for atleast 5 years.


False - The Constitution does not establish any qualifications or criteria for the judicial

branch; by custom, they must be lawyers.

Almost one-half of all Supreme Court justices during this century have had no

prior experience as judges (including some of the most prominent and influential

justices, such as John Marshall, Louis Brandeis, Harlan Stone, Charles Evans

Hughes, Felix Frankfurter, Earl Warren, and William Rehnquist).


All federal judges are nominated by who and approved (confirmed) by who?

View Answer

All federal judges are nominated by who and approved (confirmed) by who?


1) President

2) Senate


After defining the kind of person he wants in general terms, the president delegates

the task of identifying judicial candidates to who/whom?

View Answer

After defining the kind of person he wants in general terms, the president delegates

the task of identifying judicial candidates to who/whom?


Senior White House staff members and the attorney general.


This is the right of the senior senator from the president’s party in the state where the district court is located to approve the nominee.

View Answer

This is the right of the senior senator from the president’s party in the state where the district court is located to approve the nominee.


Senatorial Courtesy


This president was stunned when Chief Justice Warren Burger voted with a unanimous Court to override the president's claim of executive privilege and forced him to give up the documents that would seal his fate in the Watergate affair.

  

View Answer

This president was stunned when Chief Justice Warren Burger voted with a unanimous Court to override the president's claim of executive privilege and forced him to give up the documents that would seal his fate in the Watergate affair.

  


Richard Nixon


This landmark cases established the right to counsel in criminal cases.

View Answer

This landmark cases established the right to counsel in criminal cases.


Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)


The most important tool that the Court has for controlling its agenda is the power

to grant—or not to grant, an order from an appellate court to lower courts demanding that they send up a complete record of the case.

View Answer

The most important tool that the Court has for controlling its agenda is the power

to grant—or not to grant, an order from an appellate court to lower courts demanding that they send up a complete record of the case.


a writ of certiorari (‘cert’)

 

http://www.merriam-webster.com/audio.php?file=certio02&word=certiorari&text=%5C%CB%8Cs%C9%99r-sh(%C4%93-)%C9%99-%CB%88rer-%C4%93%2C%20-%CB%88r%C3%A4r-%C4%93%2C%20-%CB%88ra-r%C4%93%5C


1) This is a statement of the legal reasoning that supports the decision of

the Court.

 

2) By tradition,who assigns the majority opinion if he voted with the majority in conference (and sometimes assigns it to himself); if this person votes with the minority

(dissenters), the senior member of the majority assigns the opinion (this is one

of the norms referred to above).

View Answer

1) This is a statement of the legal reasoning that supports the decision of

the Court.

 

2) By tradition,who assigns the majority opinion if he voted with the majority in conference (and sometimes assigns it to himself); if this person votes with the minority

(dissenters), the senior member of the majority assigns the opinion (this is one

of the norms referred to above).


1) Written Opinion

2) Chief Justice


There are two main views that dicatate the courts with regards to the US Constitution.  Some beleive the court must be guided by the orginal intentions of the framers and the words in the Constitution while there are others that believe the intentions of the Founders are impossible to determine and would be unreasonably constricting in the twentieth century; they beleive that jurits must try to reconcile the fundamental principles of the Constituion with changing conditions.

View Answer

There are two main views that dicatate the courts with regards to the US Constitution.  Some beleive the court must be guided by the orginal intentions of the framers and the words in the Constitution while there are others that believe the intentions of the Founders are impossible to determine and would be unreasonably constricting in the twentieth century; they beleive that jurits must try to reconcile the fundamental principles of the Constituion with changing conditions.


Loose Construction and Original Intention (Strict Construction).


Although adherence to precedent is one of the traditional norms that guides judicial decision making, these three courts have not hesitated to overturn previous Court decisions

View Answer

Although adherence to precedent is one of the traditional norms that guides judicial decision making, these three courts have not hesitated to overturn previous Court decisions


Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist Courts (particularly the last)


This individual or branch can file suits through the Justice Department, try to move public opion against the Court, and can threaten to introduce legislation to alter teh Court's organization or jurisdiction.  This indvidual or branch makes appointments of justices.

View Answer

This individual or branch can file suits through the Justice Department, try to move public opion against the Court, and can threaten to introduce legislation to alter teh Court's organization or jurisdiction.  This indvidual or branch makes appointments of justices.


The President


This branch or individual retains the power to change the size, organization, and appellate jurisdiction of the federal courts.

View Answer

This branch or individual retains the power to change the size, organization, and appellate jurisdiction of the federal courts.


Congress


This branch or individual can apply pressure by being unsympathetic to pleas from the

justices for pay increases or for a suitable budget for clerks or office space.

They can change statutes or pass new laws that specifically challenge

Supreme Court decisions.

View Answer

This branch or individual can apply pressure by being unsympathetic to pleas from the

justices for pay increases or for a suitable budget for clerks or office space.

They can change statutes or pass new laws that specifically challenge

Supreme Court decisions.


Congress


This is the political economic doctrine that holds the government should not interfere with the operations of the free market.  

View Answer

This is the political economic doctrine that holds the government should not interfere with the operations of the free market.  


Laissez-faire


In what case did the court rule in-favor of President Franklin D. Roosevelt to Executive Order 9066 during World War II which authorized the relocation or internment of Japanese Americans.

View Answer

In what case did the court rule in-favor of President Franklin D. Roosevelt to Executive Order 9066 during World War II which authorized the relocation or internment of Japanese Americans.


Korematsu vs United States (1944)

In a 6-3 decision, the Court sided with the government, ruling that the exclusion order was constitutional. Six of eight Roosevelt appointees sided with Roosevelt. The lone Republican appointee, Owen Roberts, dissented.


1) This Supreme Court case stated that if a federal and state law are in conflict, the federal law is supreme.

It created the Supremacy Clause.

 

2) This Supreme Court case determined that in the field of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place.  This overruled the segregation that was mainly in the Southern US.

 

3) This Supreme Court case determined that defendants in criminal cases have an absolute right to counsel.


View Answer

1) This Supreme Court case stated that if a federal and state law are in conflict, the federal law is supreme.

It created the Supremacy Clause.

 

2) This Supreme Court case determined that in the field of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place.  This overruled the segregation that was mainly in the Southern US.

 

3) This Supreme Court case determined that defendants in criminal cases have an absolute right to counsel.


1) Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824

Congress and New York had both passed laws regulating the steamboat industry. Gibbons had a federal permit for a steamboat business; Ogden had a state permit for the same waters. Siding with Gibbons, the Court said that, in matters of interstate commerce, the “Supremacy Clause” tilts the balance of power in favor of federal legislation.

 

2) Brown v. Board of Education, 1954

This unanimous decision marked the beginning of the end for the “Separate But Equal” era that started with Plessy, and the start of a new period of American race relations. With Brown, desegregation of public schools began—as did resistance to it. Ten contentious years later, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made racial equality a matter of federal law.

 

3) Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963

Too poor to afford a lawyer, Clarence Earl Gideon was convicted for breaking into a poolroom—a felony crime in  Florida. He appealed to the Supreme Court, which ruled that the government must provide free counsel to accused criminals who cannot pay for it themselves. At first, the ruling applied to felonies only. It was later extended to cover any cases where the penalty was six months imprisonment or longer.





Scoreboard
Scoreboard
Team 1
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 2
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 3
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 4
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 5
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 6
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 7
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 8
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 9
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 10
Lose Point
Add Point


What Would You Like To Risk?

Scoreboard
Team 1
Minus 1
Plus 1
Team 2
Minus 1
Plus 1
Team 3
Minus 1
Plus 1
Team 4
Minus 1
Plus 1
Team 5
Minus 1
Plus 1
Team 6
Minus 1
Plus 1
Team 7
Minus 1
Plus 1
Team 8
Minus 1
Plus 1
Team 9
Minus 1
Plus 1
Team 10
Minus 1
Plus 1


Go To The Final Question
Final Score:
Scoreboard
Team 1
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 2
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 3
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 4
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 5
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 6
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 7
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 8
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 9
Lose Point
Add Point
Team 10
Lose Point
Add Point


Create a New Game Create a New Game

Copy This Game