AP GOPO Review 4 SpeedMatch Review Game

exclusionary rule applies to states

- The Court upheld the Georgia death sentence, finding that it did NOT violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the 8th Amendment. The Court stated for the first time that “punishment of death does NOT invariably violate the Constitution.”

-the Court refused the halt publication of the Pentagon Papers (detailed critical account of US involvement in Vietnam).

The case, involving “criminal anarchy”, under New York law, was the first consideration of what came to be known as the selective “incorporation” doctrine, under which the provisions of the 1st amendment were “incorporated” by the 14th amendment

Court considered the use of public funds for the operation of school buses in NJ, including buses carrying students to parochial school. The Court permitted New Jersey to continue payments, saying that the aid to children was not gov’t support for religion.

-Precedent- guarantee of counsel (attorney) for all person facing a felony charge in federal and state trials

Chief Justice Marshall established “judicial review'

-Freedom of Speech and Expression (1st Amendment) -Ruling- allowed to wear the black arm bands -Precedent- “Student’s right to expression would be protected except in cases where that expression materially disrupts class work or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others...

- Article I, section 8, Necessary and Proper Clause and National Supremacy

-Precedent- “have a right to remain silent, that anything said can be used in Court, right to an attorney, if he can’t afford one, one will be appointed for him” etc.

-established the prior restraint doctrine AND -Selective Incorporation of the 1st amendment freedom of press

Struck down state funding for private religious schools

5th amendment (eminent domain) did not apply to states but only to the federal gov’t (BOR does NOT apply to STATES).

-Precedent- US S.C. outlawed the use, even on a voluntary basis, of state- sponsored prayer in schools

the Court defined obscene that which offended “the average person, applying contemporary community standards.”

- The Supreme Court loosened restrictions on corporate and union-funded television ads that air close to elections, weakening a key provision of a landmark campaign finance law.

-upheld soft and hard money limits and the ban of electioneering not subject to the cap within the 90 day window before a federal election

-Freedom of Speech (1st amendment) -Ruling- Texas statute prohibiting the burning of the flag is unconstitutional -Precedent- You may burn the flag

The Court upheld a stringent application of California obscenity law by Newport Beach, CA, and attempted to define what is obscene.

held that laws that punish people for advocating social change through violence violate the first amendment, the advocacy of an idea even an idea of violence is protected by the 1st amendment. What is not protected is inciting people to engage in violence

under the circumstances created a “clear and present” danger... Although later decisions modified the decision, this case created the PRECEDENT that 1st amendment guarantees weren’t absolute

The Court this created a “reasonable suspicion” rule for school searches, a change from the “probable cause” requirement in the wider society.

-Precedent- schools could censor student speech when schools had a reasonable educational justification for their censorship esp. when the speech was part of an educational activity

Play This Game Again!

You did it!
You got every match correct!

Here are all the answers:

Description	Match:
- Article I, section 8, Necessary and Proper Clause and National Supremacy	McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Chief Justice Marshall established “judicial review'	Marbury v. Madison (1803)
5th amendment (eminent domain) did not apply to states but only to the federal gov’t (BOR does NOT apply to STATES).	Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
under the circumstances created a “clear and present” danger... Although later decisions modified the decision, this case created the PRECEDENT that 1st amendment guarantees weren’t absolute	Schenck v. US (1919)
The case, involving “criminal anarchy”, under New York law, was the first consideration of what came to be known as the selective “incorporation” doctrine, under which the provisions of the 1st amendment were “incorporated” by the 14th amendment	Gitlow v. New York (1925)
-Freedom of Speech and Expression (1st Amendment) -Ruling- allowed to wear the black arm bands -Precedent- “Student’s right to expression would be protected except in cases where that expression materially disrupts class work or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others...	Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
-Freedom of Speech (1st amendment) -Ruling- Texas statute prohibiting the burning of the flag is unconstitutional -Precedent- You may burn the flag	Texas v. Johnson (1989)
held that laws that punish people for advocating social change through violence violate the first amendment, the advocacy of an idea even an idea of violence is protected by the 1st amendment. What is not protected is inciting people to engage in violence	Bradenburg v. Ohio (1969)
-upheld soft and hard money limits and the ban of electioneering not subject to the cap within the 90 day window before a federal election	McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003)
- The Supreme Court loosened restrictions on corporate and union-funded television ads that air close to elections, weakening a key provision of a landmark campaign finance law.	F.E.C. v. Wisconsin Right to Life and McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life (2006)
-established the prior restraint doctrine AND -Selective Incorporation of the 1st amendment freedom of press	Near v. Minnesota (1931)
-the Court refused the halt publication of the Pentagon Papers (detailed critical account of US involvement in Vietnam).	New York Times v. US (1971)
-Precedent- schools could censor student speech when schools had a reasonable educational justification for their censorship esp. when the speech was part of an educational activity	Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
-Precedent- US S.C. outlawed the use, even on a voluntary basis, of state- sponsored prayer in schools	Engel v. Vitale (1962)-
Struck down state funding for private religious schools	Lemon v. Kurzman (1971)-
The Court upheld a stringent application of California obscenity law by Newport Beach, CA, and attempted to define what is obscene.	Miller v. California (1973)
Court considered the use of public funds for the operation of school buses in NJ, including buses carrying students to parochial school. The Court permitted New Jersey to continue payments, saying that the aid to children was not gov’t support for religion.	Everson v. Board of Education (1947)-
the Court defined obscene that which offended “the average person, applying contemporary community standards.”	Roth v. US (1957)
exclusionary rule applies to states	Mapp v. Ohio- 1961
The Court this created a “reasonable suspicion” rule for school searches, a change from the “probable cause” requirement in the wider society.	NJ v. TLO- 1985
-Precedent- guarantee of counsel (attorney) for all person facing a felony charge in federal and state trials	Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
-Precedent- “have a right to remain silent, that anything said can be used in Court, right to an attorney, if he can’t afford one, one will be appointed for him” etc.	Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
- The Court upheld the Georgia death sentence, finding that it did NOT violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the 8th Amendment. The Court stated for the first time that “punishment of death does NOT invariably violate the Constitution.”	Gregg v. Georgia (1976)